Tuesday, April 05, 2011

A New Era in Tamil Nadu State Politics

The 2011 Assembly elections are a major turning point in the political history of Tamil Nadu for at least four reasons.

Tamil Nadu is best known as the hotbed of the Dravidian movement, the non-Hindi, anti-Congress movement in Tamil Nadu that started in 1925 fighting issues like untouchability. The DMK, a part of that movement, took to the political platform to achieve its aims. But in time, it got sucked up in the web of cutthroat politics, dropping its agenda one by one. Also, the early leaders of the movement are long gone, leaving behind a lone General in the form of ‘Kalaignar’ Karunanidhi.

‘Kalaignar’, a prolific writer and a fighter with enormous staying power, is getting old. He is 86 and wheelchair-bound. It is an open secret that the government is run by his son, M.K. Stalin (born the same week as Russian leader Joseph Stalin died). Karunanidhi may not be able to ignore old age much longer. In the next elections in 2016, he would be 91, and too old for the bloody games of politics he once reveled in.

So, the current elections may well be the last for the classical Dravidian movement. A number of parties have prefixed ‘Dravida’ to their name but there is no one in those parties who can claim that legacy. Cinema is the only political ideology now in the state, ruled by film icons for the past 42 years.

The polls will also mark a generational change in Tamil Nadu politics after 22 years. It was in 1989 that Jayalalithaa led a faction of the AIADMK for the first time into the polls. Karunanidhi, who had fought against the likes of Kamaraj, Rajaji and MGR, is still reeling under the impact of her charisma.

Today, his own sons — Stalin and M.K. Azhagiri — are ready to replace him. The Congress party is increasingly leaning towards new leaders like G.K. Vasan and Karthi Chidambaram. Actor Vijaykanth has become a force to reckon with. These are the people that Jayalalithaa will henceforth worry about, not the old warhorse.

With so many leaders, votes are getting fragmented. The state’s vote bank first moved beyond the three giants—DMK, AIADMK and the Congress—in 1991 when PMK fought on a casteist agenda. More parties cropped up after that. All of them had to align with either DMK or AIADMK to survive, but that also meant the two giants had to part with more constituencies.

This time, the DMK is contesting in only 121 seats, just three more than the half-way mark. The AIADMK, too, has a number of smaller parties in its alliance and has been locked in a battle of nerves with them over seat-sharing. In other words, the two major parties will have to consider alliance partners in power equations. This could well be the dawn of coalition era in the state.

The fourth factor that makes this Assembly election so interesting to watch is the shrewd way in which the Congress Party is trying to reinvent itself in Tamil Nadu. It is fully exploiting the misfortune of DMK, forcing it to give away 63 seats, 15 more than the 2006 elections, and has cornered some juicy constituencies. Over the years, the vote share of Congress has fallen from 20 percent to just 8 percent. This is its best chance to reverse the trend.

Should the alliance scrape through, the Congress will dictate to DMK on government formation. But for now, the biggest worry for both parties is to get their hostile cadres to work together and put up a bloody good fight.

Tamil Nadu elections: Kalaignar's swan song?

Those who stray from the moral path will have neither peace in success not fortitude in tribulation; their pain is like that of the palanquin-carrier who cannot put his burden away.

M Karunanidhi in Kuraloviyam, a commentary on Thirukkural

Those with even a passing knowledge of Tamil Nadu politics know that it is an accepted practice there to bribe voters with hard cash to persuade them to vote in a particular way. Things came to such a pass in recent bye-elections that some voters even auctioned their suffrage to the highest bidder. The current inflation-adjusted rate is about Rs. 6,000 per smudged finger in a Legislative Assembly election.

So it is reasonable to surmise that as election fever grips the state, political workers crisscrossing the 234 constituencies should be carrying stashes of cash. Indeed, the election commission and the income tax department thought so too; their flying squads checked passing cars and raided the houses of political workers. And what a rich haul they made! Within a week, they seized Rs.20 crore in unaccounted money. Naturally, no party claimed ownership or asked for the cash back.

2G spectrum case: Anil Ambani quizzed by PAC

Reliance Communications Chairman Anil Ambani was today questioned by Parliament’s Public Accounts Committee in connection with alleged irregularities in the 2G spectrum allocation.

Etisalat DB Telecom CEO Atul Jham was also questioned by the panel headed by senior BJP leader Murli Manohar Joshi.

The PAC had on Monday quizzed Tata Sons Chairman Ratan Tata and corporate lobbyist Niira Radia in connection with the 2G spectrum scam.

The panel had quizzed Radia for two hours and Tata for three hours on issues related to the scam.

S-Tel CEO Shamik Das and Unitech Wireless Managing Director Sigve Brekke are also scheduled to appear before the PAC today.

Thursday, March 17, 2011

Congress sails through in MLC elections

Congress MLAs loyal to Y S Jaganmohan Reddy gave a scare to chief minister N Kiran Kumar Reddy by defying his directive and voting for the MIM candidate and not for the ruling party candidates in the legislative council elections under the MLA segment here on Thursday. Significantly, 3 TRS MLAs did not vote for its party candidate.

In the end, all the five Congress candidates and the ruling party-supported PRP and MIM candidates managed to get elected. While Congress nominees Paladu Venkat Rao, Chengal Rayudu, Sudhakar Babu and M Ranga Reddy sailed through with comfortable victories by securing the required 27 first preference votes, fifth nominee Mohammad Jani got only 17 first preference votes with MIM's Syed Altaf Hyder Rizvi getting the highest number of 36 votes. It was evident at least 9 Jagan loyalist MLAs did not vote for Jani and instead, wasted it on Rizvi by giving him 9 first preference votes more than the required 27. Jani, however, managed to win by securing the second preference votes. Congress-supported PRP candidate C Ramachandraiah also won by securing 26 first preference votes and the remaining in the second. The TDP managed to get two of its three nominees elected with D Gangadhar Goud securing 23 first preference votes and D Satish Reddy getting 24 first preference votes and managing the remaining with the second preference votes.